Nugget Newspaper - Sisters, Oregon News, Events, Classifieds | Sisters, Oregon Nugget Sponsorship



HOMENEWSOPINIONCLASSIFIEDSCouponsCALENDARObituariesROAD REPORTVideo Library
Latest Sisters, Oregon, weather
Current News
Education
Business
Sports & Recreation
Health
Home & Garden
Pets Lost/Found Pets Free
Columns
Obituaries
Announcements
Area Events
Calendar
Arts & Entertainment
Archive
OPINION
Editorial
Letters
Contact List
Advertising
Camp Sherman
City of Sisters
Deschutes County
Public Library
Sisters Guide
Sisters Chamber
Sisters Map
Sisters Schools
SPRD




Advanced Search

home : opinions : opinions May 27, 2018


5/15/2018 1:01:00 PM
Permits to replace freedom of the hills
By Art Pope


Are you a hiker, backpacker or climber - or a person who just loves getting outside? Well, if you haven't heard, your ability to access five of Oregon's premier wilderness areas is about to change. The Willamette and Deschutes National Forests, concerned about impacts associated with overuse, have proposed a quota-based permit system for the Three Sisters, Mount Jefferson, Mount Washington, Diamond Peak, and Waldo Lake wilderness areas. No doubt about it; this is a historic change. Soon it will take much more than just a free weekend or great weather forecast for you to be able to load up and go hiking or backpacking in these areas.

The Forest Service has determined that overuse is causing resource damage and that restricting access is the only way to address the problem. At just over 200 pages, the Environmental Assessment for the Cascades Wilderness Strategies Project is a massive document full of data and copious references to impressive research studies. Five alternative actions are proposed but, except for the no-action alternative, they all end up in the same place: a quota-based permit system.

As far as I have been able to determine, if any of the proposed alternatives (other than no-action) are adopted, it will create the biggest, most restrictive and comprehensive limited-entry wilderness permit program in the country. Make no mistake, if you visit any of the five wilderness areas addressed in this plan you will be impacted. Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, requires permits for all overnight camping in all five wilderness areas and permits for day hikes at most trailheads.

Implementing a limited-entry permit system over five wilderness areas is a very big deal, and the need for such a program should be indisputably documented. It is not. Though the underlying premise is that use levels must be reduced because overuse is causing damage to the resource there is insufficient documentation of extensive resource damage to justify implementation of such an extensive and restrictive permit system.

The agency's push for a limited-entry permit system, one impacting such a vast area with so little background data on user impacts, might make one ask if generating revenue was a major focus of this plan - a concern not without merit. The permit system on Idaho's Middle Fork of the Salmon generates tens of thousands of dollars in application fees every year. Yes, that's right, application fees. Would-be boaters must pay to apply even when most never get to float the river.

Could this happen in Oregon? Absolutely! Unfortunately, we just don't know; the current Forest Service NEPA document does not address fees or budgets. As it was explained to me, consideration of issues related to the permit system - things like fees, budgets, personnel and such - are outside the scope of the NEPA review; the public will have the opportunity to comment on those issues at a later date.

Being asked to comment on this proposal without knowing how much it will cost and how it will work is rather like being asked to buy a house without going inside. I was told that the agency expects permit fees to not only support the permit system but trail crews, wilderness rangers and desk time for office staff. Based on traditional norms, permit fees will also support a percentage of payroll costs for everyone that touches wilderness; from the District Ranger to the Forest Supervisor. How much will all this cost? Right now, we just don't know. My guess: it won't be cheap.

In some instances, there is no alternative to a permit system. However, the question Forest Service leadership has failed to address is: are we truly at a point where there is no alternative to a quota-based permit system? It is not clear to me that we are.

You have until May 21 to comment on the Central Cascades Wilderness Strategies Project. Contact Beth Peer, bpeer@fs.fed.us or 541-383-5554; or Matt Peterson mbpeterson@fs.fed.us, 541-225-6421 if you have questions.









Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   
















Life
© Copyright 2018. All rights reserved. The Nugget Newspaper, LLC
PO Box 698 • 442 E. Main Ave., Sisters, Oregon 97759 • 541-549-9941 office • 541-549-9940 Fax

Life



Software © 1998-2018 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved