Today's weather in Sisters
Local News
Current News
Sports & Recreation
Education
Business
Arts & Entertainment
HEALTH
HOME & GARDEN
Opinion
Editorial
Guest Columnist
Columns
Letters to the Editor
Submit a Letter to the Editor
Classifieds
Browse Classified Ads
Search Classified Ads
Place a Classified Ad
Calendar
Obits
Announcements
Announcements
Anniversary
Engagement
Wedding
Births
Pet Place
Pet of the Week
Subscribe
What air power can - and can't - do on a fire
By Jim Cornelius
, News Editor
Monday, August 21, 2017 9:53 AM
An air tanker makes a retardant drop to slow the progress of the Milli Fire west of Sisters.
photo by Cody Rheault
There's no more impressive sight than a heavy tanker swooping out of the smoke over a forest fire, dropping a vivid red smear of retardant. For local residents, it's comforting to hear the tankers rumbling over the rooftops to do battle with the smoky monster that looms on the horizon over their town.
The sheer power and majesty of the aerial assault leads many people to believe that retardant drops can stop a raging blaze. While air power is critical to the battle, it can't win it on its own.
The key to understanding the role of retardant drops on a fire lies in the word itself: Retardant retards the progress of fire - it doesn't put it out.
Sisters Ranger District Assistant Fire Management Officer Jinny Reed told The Nugget that, "Retardant is primarily utilized when life and property are threatened. Retardant can slow fire progression to allow ground resources the opportunity to safely contain the progression of a wildfire along the fires edge, and sometimes at the head. If applied properly, it can reduce fire intensity to a level acceptable for dozers and handcrews to contain forward spread."
That's why viewers will often see that smear of retardant going down out ahead of the fire instead of right in it. The retardant is being used by ground forces to help them build containment lines.
"Aerial retardant is only effective when utilized in tandem with ground forces such as dozers and handcrews," Reed said.
In fact, retardant drops won't be made if there aren't ground resources available to exploit them.
Retardant drops work better in some terrain than in others.
"It is most effective in grass and shrub vegetation types," Reed reported. "Retardant is less effective in timber vegetation types."
Tankers are not always available. There are a limited number of them across the country and they're allocated based on a priorty system that assesses threats to lives and property. Sometimes tankers working a fire in Sisters Country will be called away to a higher-priority fire.
Fire conditions can also dictate whether or not retardant can be used.
"Retardant cannot be utilized if visibility is poor (or) during high winds," Reed said.
So, while retardant drops from tankers are a critical - and spectacular - tool for firefighters, the battle is not won in the air. It's fought out on the ground, by the men and women hauling hose, wielding chainsaws and cutting on a firebreak line.
Retardant drops can also have negative environmental effects, so air operations commanders have to be cautious about their deployment in sensitive areas.
Kassidy Kern of the Deschutes National Forest reported that a retardant drop deployed near the rim of Whychus Creek Canyon to fight the Milli Fire as it roared toward the east probably came in a second or two early."
As a result, she said, "up to 140 gallons of retardant probably made its way into Whychus Creek."
She said that a fisheries biologist patrolled the area to assess damage and found no fish kill or other adverse effects.
1
1
Comments
Newest ▼
Oldest ▲
A few things jumped out at me as I read this story.
There's no more no more impressive sight than a heavy tanker swooping out of the smoke over a forest fire, dropping a vivid red smear of retardant.
Retardant retards the progress of fire - it doesn't put it out.
In fact, retardant drops won't be made if there aren't ground resources available to exploit them.
What the story doesn’t address is that retardant is a sole source contract.
The USFS only allows retardant in large air tankers. Many other aircraft (Single Engine Air Tankers in particular) operate out of large air tanker bases, so they also use retardant. There are a number of cheaper, safer and more effective chemicals that could be used in air tankers, but because they aren’t retardants they can’t even be considered.
In full disclosure, I market an environmentally benign fire extinguishing agent (recipient of the Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award) that won’t harm the environment, is about 8% the cost of retardant, doesn’t require a mixing base (about $10,000 per day for large air tankers), and extinguishes fires as it is dropped on them – direct attack. This has been field proven in SEATS and Global SuperTanker’s 747 in Chile where the water/hemical drop was credited with saving many resources and the village of Llico.
You probably are wondering how a company gets a sole source contract. In the case of retardant, a company hired senior retired USFS employees. The company patented a gum thickened retardant. Four months after the patent was approved for this gum thickened retardant, the USFS changed the specification for retardant. The new specification matched the patent.
Even though other retardants had been approved by the USFS (these other retardants passed the 2 year “rigorous” testing requirements the USFS has for toxicity, corrosion and a few other items – notwithstanding the USFS lab has no of the accreditations, but that is another story), they could not be considered because they were not gum thickened.
The result of a sole source contract was a 300% increase in the cost of retardant, the patented retardant is no more effective than the retardants it replaced and the patented retardant kills fish with the same ease the retardants it replaced did.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
jack sexton
8/23/2017 7:09:00 AM
Report this comment
1
Submit a comment
*
indicates a required field
Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.
Comment
*
Your Name
Email
Phone
A comment must be approved by our staff before it will displayed on the website.
Submit
X
Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Search only accepts letters and numbers.
THE NUGGET NEWSPAPER
442 E. Main Ave.
Sisters, Oregon
Office: 541-549-9941
Hours: 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Mon., Tues., Thurs., Fri.
Mailing Address:
PO Box 698
Sisters, OR 97759
Facebook
Instagram
Issuu
READ ONLINE
Announcements
Area Events
Arts & Entertainment
Business
Calendar
Classifieds
Columns
Current News
Education
Editorial
Health
Home & Garden
Letters to the Editor
Opinion
Obituaries
Sports & Recreation
ABOUT US
Advertising
Subscribe
Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy
AREA LINKS
Sisters Oregon Guide
Camp Sherman
City of Sisters
Sisters Chamber of Commerce
Sisters Public Library
Sisters Schools
Sisters Park & Recreation District
Deschutes County
Sisters Map
Road Report
Weather
© Copyright 2019. All rights reserved. The Nugget Newspaper, LLC
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##