News and Opinion from Sisters, Oregon

PMR gets city water and zone change

Pine Meadow Ranch developers have won a zoning change from the county and a commitment from the City of Sisters for water service.

The Deschutes Board of County Commissioners declined an appeal July 29 and adopted two ordinances changing the zoning on 50 acres of the Pine Meadow Ranch development from reserve to residential zoning. No one appeared at the meeting to oppose the ordinances.

The project also secured a commitment from the city to supply city water to 12 commercial-zoned acres of the development. The Sisters City Council granted a request for water service from PMR Development Co. on the condition that the development meets all the requirements of the Sisters Public Works Department and that PMR consents to annexation of the land to the city.

According to McGhehey, PMR's request was intended to meet the Deschutes County requirement that developers specify a project's water source.

McGhehey said PMR can drill a well which would provide an adequate water source, but, he said, it makes more sense to use city water.

According to City Public Works Supervisor Gary Frazee there are five 10-inch lines stubbed at the edge of the ranch for future water users.

McGhehey said he requested a "forward commitment" from the city "specifically dated now." He wants the commitment in hand before two initiatives are voted on by Sisters residents. One would prevent the extension of city services beyond the city limits without voter approval. The other would require voter approval of annexations of land to the city. Both measures are intended to block the PMR development, according to advocates.

The PMR request was opposed by Sisters resident Gordon Petrie, who called the request premature.

"Plans have not been presented to, or approved by, the city...," Petrie argued. "The nature of the businesses has not been stated other than the Les Schwab project. Quantities of water to be used have not been stated...

"Putting this matter on the agenda with no public hearing is a blatant attempt by the city administration to bypass the voters on a very important matter... the application should be fully rejected at this time."

McGhehey said what is being proposed on the property -- 12 acres of commercial development and 50 acres of high- and standard-density residential projects -- has been in the city's comprehensive plan since 1979.

 

Reader Comments(0)