News and Opinion from Sisters, Oregon
News and Opinion from Sisters, Oregon
Sisters Eagle Airport has been added to a state listing. The airport has become considerably more active in recent years, which has led to some conflicts over noise.
UPDATE: The Oregon Aviation board will re-hear the application of Sisters Eagle Airport to be included on Oregon's listing of airports of state concern in their April 20 meeting. The re-hearing was triggered due to public comment being omitted from the written record for the March meeting.
In a unanimous decision, the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) board of directors agreed last week to list Sisters Eagle Airport in Appendix M as a privately owned, public-use airport of State concern. ODA confirmed that the airport meets all three of the criteria for listing:
A. Provide(s) important links in air traffic in this state;
B. Provide(s) essential safety or emergency services;
C. (Is) of economic importance to the County where the airport is located.
The listing essentially resolves what may have been a paperwork oversight of the previous airport owner when airports across Oregon were listed some 30 years ago. The actual impact of the listing is minimal.
"No change in the current use of the airport occurs as a result of the vote," ODA Director Mitch Swecker told The Nugget.
The listing does make the airport eligible for State Pavement Maintenance Program (PMP) for Airports of Significance.
Critics of some of the airport's operations had requested a delay of the ODA decision.
Airport co-owner Julie Benson told The Nugget that "the importance of the listing has been greatly exaggerated, and blown completely out of proportion. It does not mean there will be F-18 fighter jets or Blackhawk helicopters flying in and out of Sisters. Boeing will not be setting up test operations of 767s at Sisters. The Olympic Skydiving team will not be relocating to Sisters. The airport will not be expanded 400 percent. It means it's an airport, like it has been since 1933."
Benson said that the top priorities of her and her husband Benny in operating the airport is to support their company ENERGYneering Solutions, Inc. in progress toward filling the firm's master plan.
"That is still our priority, to have a home that is adequate for ESI to thrive," Benson said.
The Bensons also seek to deepen and broaden the impact of the Outlaw Aviation high school aviation program.
"I want to create a magnate program for flight science," she said.
Benson reported that opportunities to align curriculum to take advantage of a developing partnership between the Central Oregon Community College aviation program and Horizon/Alaska are presenting themselves.
"That's where I want to focus my energies, on making sure the kids have those opportunities," she said.
She said she is also working on a plan for students to build a hangar at the airport as a CTE (Career Technical Education) program.
Some of the airport's operations have been the focus of conflict and controversy - particularly a skydiving operation. Some local residents contend that the airport noise and increased commercial activity is negatively impacting the quality of life that attracted them to Sisters in the first place - namely, a quiet rural lifestyle. They fear reduced property values and difficulty selling their property, also due to the increased noisy activity at the airport.
Benson emphasized to The Nugget that the skydiving operation and the airport are separate entities and that, as a public-use airport, they are obliged not to discriminate against types of use.
"The airport is not the skydive business, have no partnership or ownership interest," Benson told The Nugget. "As part of our State and Federal grant obligations, the airport cannot discriminate against one aircraft (Skydivers Cessna 182), or prohibit use from public... That's not really an option for us, to say 'Skydivers go away.' We could get sued for that; we're a public-use airport."
Benson further notes that those who have moved into the airport zone have explicitly "waive(d) their rights to subsequently complain about airport impacts.... And "have no remaining rights to complain or protest about the protected activities."
Benson said that the airport has not acted to enforce the airport zone waiver of rights.
Both sides in the conflict over noise have indicated a willingness to sit down and talk - and say that the other side is unwilling to do so.
Members of the local activist group Save Our Skies (SOS) at a city hearing last month asked that Deschutes County and the City of Sisters put pressure on Benny and Julie Benson to sit down for a face-to-face meeting with concerned citizens impacted by airport noise from commercial operations.
Julie Benson says that they are open to such a meeting and notes that airport manager David Campbell has met with concerned residents.
"He takes notes and listens to people who want to come and have a one-on-one conversation," she said.
She said that she is willing to "come to the table" with SOS, but that it's not clear if anyone can act to represent the members of the group, or whether mitigation of impact is the goal.
"SOS is not willing to mitigate (noise impact) - they just want it to stop," Benson said.
She said that mitigation is possible. The airport has a noise abatement protocol, which is clearly stated on a large sign affixed to one of the airport buildings. However, the airport cannot enforce a particular action on the part of a pilot once they leave the ground.
Benson acknowledged that there are mechanical adaptations that could make a difference with propeller noise on the skydiving aircraft - such as installing a three-bladed propeller or adding a muffler.
"Absolutely, I believe there are some mechanical modifications that would help that plane," she said. "They're expensive. Who's going to pay for that? That's absolutely something that could bring to the table - if we can get to the table."
There is at least an opportunity for the impasse over "getting to the table" to be broken. The airport has hired Anne George as a facilitator "to meet with the two parties to further communication and cooperation," according to Benson.
Meanwhile, there is one more procedural hoop to jump through. "Because Appendix M/Exhibit 2 is in an administrative rule, we have to go through the official rule making process to add Sisters airport to the list of privately owned public use airports of state significance," ODA Director Swecker told The Nugget. "Nothing changes but there will be another public comment period."
Jim Cornelius is editor in chief of The Nugget and author of “Warriors of the Wildlands: True Tales of the Frontier Partisans.” A history buff, he explores frontier history across three centuries and several continents on his podcast, The Frontier Partisans. For more information visit www.frontierpartisans.com.
Reader Comments(0)